Grade working, not only answers
The prompt asks for evidence from the student work so marks can be tied to method, accuracy, and reasoning.
Resource
Grading Prompt FAQ
This FAQ explains the product principles behind Gradenza grading prompts: preserve mathematical reasoning, expose grading decisions, and keep teachers in control before feedback is released.
Details
Prompt design principles
Carry the student value when appropriate
For IB Follow Through cases, later work can be assessed against the value the student actually used.
Flag uncertainty
When handwriting, OCR, diagrams, or ambiguous notation weaken confidence, the report should make that visible to the teacher.
Related
Continue with the closest workflow
These links point to existing product pages or the most relevant utility route.
FAQ
Common questions
Does Gradenza automatically finalise grades?
No. Gradenza drafts grading reports for teacher or tutor review before feedback is released.
Can the prompt handle Follow Through marks?
For supported IB Math workflows, the grading logic is designed to evaluate later parts against the student carried value when the markscheme allows it.
What happens when the work is unclear?
The report should surface uncertainty rather than silently pretending the submission was clear.
Next step
Use the best-fit Gradenza route
Start from the workflow that already matches your role, subject, or support need.